Evidence of the clinical effect of commonly used intra‐articular treatments of equine osteoarthritis

Author:

Nedergaard Anne1ORCID,Carlsson Lisa Emilia1ORCID,Lindegaard Casper1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Copenhagen Taastrup Denmark

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease in equine patients that causes joint pain and loss of function. The aetiology of OA is assumed to be multifactorial. A range of medical treatments are on the market for symptomatic treatment of OA in equine patients, both biological and conventional options. Today, no true disease‐modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) is available.ObjectiveTo summarise the current evidence of the clinical effect of commonly used intra‐articular treatments of equine OA, specifically the use of intra‐articular glucocorticosteroids (IA‐GCs), intra‐articular hyaluronic acid (IA‐HA), intra‐articular platelet‐rich plasma/autologous‐conditioned plasma (IA‐PRP), intra‐articular interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist protein/autologous‐conditioned serum (IA‐IRAP) and intra‐articular mesenchymal stem cells (IA‐MSCs).Study designSystematic review.MethodsUsing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search identified 22 clinical studies where horses with OA, naturally occurring or induced, were treated with one of the mentioned intra‐articular treatments. The studies were reviewed to collect all in vivo studies with clinical follow‐up on horses with OA.ResultsIA‐GCs seem to have a beneficial short‐term clinical outcome. Treatment with IA‐HA shows varying clinical results and provides uncertain evidence for a beneficial clinical effect. IA‐PRP shows overall promising clinical results for a significant improvement. IA‐IRAP shows promising significant clinical effect, but most of the studies lack a control group for comparison. IA‐MSCs show varying clinical results, but a majority of the included studies show evidence for a significant improvement in clinical effect.ConclusionTo provide stronger evidence of the clinical effect of the five chosen treatments, further blinded, randomised and placebo‐controlled studies are needed.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3