Affiliation:
1. Centre for Human Drug Research Leiden The Netherlands
2. Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
3. Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionLimited data exist on heart rate stabilization in the domiciled nature of phase I clinical studies, particularly when frequent measurements of QT intervals are involved. The present analysis aimed to evaluate heart rate stability in the domiciled nature of, and stabilization after a short exercise.MethodsFifty‐six healthy male subjects were included in this analysis. Data during a domiciled clinical setting and after a short exercise were analysed. Mean values of 30 s intervals of collected electrocardiographical data (PR, RR, QT and QTcF intervals) during a 10‐min supine resting period in a domiciled nature or after walking up and down three stories (100 steps) were compared to baseline values using paired t‐tests or compared to the intrasubject standard deviation.ResultsStable heart rates and stable QTcF intervals observed immediately upon assuming a supine position in the domiciled clinical setting. After the short exercise, PR interval and RR interval were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter for up to 120 s (mean value −9.8 ± 7.2 ms) and 30 s (−160 ± 165 ms, p < 0.05), respectively. QT and QTcF intervals were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter for up to 90 and 120 s postexercise, respectively. Both QT and QTcF intervals stabilized after 2 min, but QT interval remained prolonged while QTcF interval returned to baseline levels.ConclusionIn a clinical setting, male volunteers do not require a waiting period for electrocardiographic parameter normalization. However, accurate measurement of these parameters following a short exercise necessitates a minimum 2‐min resting interval.
Subject
Physiology (medical),General Medicine,Physiology,General Medicine