Preparing for pragmatic trials in dementia care: Health equity considerations for nonpharmacological interventions

Author:

Aranda María P.12,Baier Rosa34,Hinton Ladson5,Peak Katherine D.6,Jackson Jonathan D.7,Dilworth‐Anderson Peggye8,Gitlin Laura N.91011ORCID,Jutkowitz Eric3412ORCID,Quiñones Ana R.613

Affiliation:

1. Suzanne Dworak‐Peck School of Social Work University of Southern California, Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA

2. Edward R. Roybal Institute on Aging University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

3. Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice Brown University School of Public Health Providence Rhode Island USA

4. Center for Long‐Term Care Quality & Innovation Brown University School of Public Health Providence Rhode Island USA

5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of California Davis Sacramento California USA

6. Department of Family Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA

7. Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Health Policy and Management University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

9. College of Nursing and Health Professions Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

10. School of Nursing Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA

11. Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports Providence VA Medical Center Providence Rhode Island USA

12. Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research Brown University School of Public Health Providence Rhode Island USA

13. OHSU‐PSU School of Public Health Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA

Abstract

AbstractInequities with regard to brain health, economic costs, and the evidence base for dementia care continue. Achieving health equity in dementia care requires rigorous efforts that ensure disproportionately affected populations participate fully in—and benefit from—clinical research. Embedding‐proven interventions under real‐world conditions and within existing healthcare systems have the potential to examine the effectiveness of an intervention, improve dementia care, and leverage the use of existing resources. Developing embedded pragmatic controlled trials (ePCT) research designs for nonpharmacological dementia care interventions involves a plethora of a priori assumptions and decisions. Although frameworks exist to determine whether interventions are “ready” for ePCT, there is no heuristic to assess health equity‐readiness. We discuss health equity considerations, case examples, and research strategies across ePCT study domains of evidence, risk, and alignment. Future discussions regarding health equity considerations across other domains are needed.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3