Abstract
AbstractThis article examines the role of insurgency in scaling up the co‐production of housing. Co‐production has gained in popularity in the past 15 years as both a set of practices and an intellectual framing for analyzing urbanization in the global South. Discussions of co‐production have largely emphasized the cooperative nature of the approach, asserting that a mostly non‐confrontational politics has proven effective at reshaping urban governance in ways that better meet the needs of the urban poor. However, recent analyses have identified conflict versus confrontation as a key tension in co‐production, especially as co‐productive programs seek to go to scale. I contribute to these discussions by analyzing a well‐known case of large‐scale co‐production, Thailand's Baan Mankong program, to understand the roles of insurgent versus cooperative community networks in the program's trajectory. I conclude that a more insurgent network opens up new land, resources and avenues for political participation. A more cooperative network then renders many of these interventions broadly politically acceptable to those in power. The two networks thus exist in a dialectic that has enabled the program's scaling up. I argue that research into co‐production should pay more attention to the importance of confrontational tactics by community networks.
Funder
Social Science Research Council
Fulbright Association
Chulalongkorn University
Reference51 articles.
1. Apocalyptic anti-urbanism: Mike Davis and his planet of slums
2. Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics;Appadurai A.;Environment and Urbanization,2002
3. Archer D.(2010)Social capital and participatory slum upgrading in Bangkok Thailand. PhD dissertation Department of Land Economy University of Cambridge [WWW document]. URLhttps://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.16428(accessed 8 May 2024).
4. Baan Mankong: going to scale with ‘slum’ and squatter upgrading in Thailand;Boonyabancha S.;Environment and Urbanization,2005