Exploration of barriers to screening for domestic violence in the perinatal period using an ecological framework

Author:

Usanov Christina1,Keedle Hazel2,Peters Kath2,O'Reilly Rebecca3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ryerson University Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Western Sydney University Rydalmere New South Wales Australia

3. University of New England, Western Sydney University (Adjunct) Parramatta New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo explore Australian healthcare providers' perspectives on factors that influence disclosure and domestic violence screening through the lens of Heise's (1998) integrated ecological framework.DesignThis paper reports the findings that were part of a sequential mixed methods study with survey data informing interview questions. Participants for interviews were recruited after expressing an interest after completing surveys, as well as via snowball sampling.MethodsSemi‐structured interviews were undertaken in 2017 with 12 practicing healthcare providers delivering care to women in the perinatal period in Greater Western Sydney, NSW, Australia. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) six‐step thematic approach.FindingsThe findings were framed within Heise's integrated ecological framework under four main themes. The main themes were ‘Ontogenic: Factors preventing women from disclosing’; ‘Microsystem: Factors preventing healthcare providers from asking’; ‘Exosystem: Organizational structures not conducive to screening’; and ‘Macrosystem: Cultural attitudes and socioeconomic influences affecting screening’.ConclusionOrganizational policies are needed for better systems of reminding healthcare providers to enquire for domestic and family violence and mandating this within their practices. Mandatory domestic and family violence education and training that is suitable for the time constraints and learning needs of the healthcare provider is recommended for all healthcare providers caring for perinatal women. Further research is needed in addressing culturally specific barriers for healthcare providers to enquire about domestic and family violence in a culturally appropriate way.Public and Patient Engagement and Involvement in Research (PPEI)No Patient or Public Contribution was embedded into the research reported in this paper as this research was specifically exploring healthcare providers’ perspectives on domestic violence screening within their own practice experience.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Reference37 articles.

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2015).Screening for domestic violence during pregnancy: Options for future reporting in the National Perinatal Data Collection.https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/62dfd6f0‐a69a‐4806‐bf13‐bf86a3c99583/19298.pdf.aspx?inline=true

2. Using thematic analysis in psychology

3. Campo M.(2015).Domestic and family violence in pregnancy and early parenthood: Overview and emerging interventions.https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/domestic‐and‐family‐violence‐pregnancy‐and‐early‐parenthood

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.).Violence prevention: The social‐ecological model.https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/about/social‐ecologicalmodel.html

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3