Does scientific research change minds? Linking criminology and public perceptions of policing

Author:

Boehme Hunter M.1ORCID,Adams Ian T.1,Metcalfe Christi1,Leasure Peter2,Nolan Melissa S.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA

2. Drug Enforcement and Policy Center Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics the University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractResearch summaryThis study investigates the impact of scientific research findings on public views of policing topics. Specifically, we conducted an original survey experiment to determine whether research information treatments influence respondents’ views on the effectiveness of the police in reducing crime, defunding and refunding police budgets, and use of body‐worn cameras. Our results indicated that presenting confirmatory research information had a significant positive impact on perceptions of police effectiveness in reducing crime and use of body‐worn cameras compared to comparison groups. Conversely, presenting “negative” research information had a significant negative effect on these perceptions. Interestingly, neither positive nor negative research information treatments related to defunding versus refunding the police had a statistically significant impact on respondents compared to comparison groups, suggesting that research findings have limited effects on more ideologically complex policing topics.Policy implicationsScientific research can effectively shape public perceptions of police effectiveness in reducing crime and the use of body‐worn cameras, but it has limited effects on politically charged issues, such as defunding and refunding the police. To enhance the impact of evidence‐based policing, we suggest that police administrators collaborate with researchers to evaluate new policies and disseminate these findings widely to the public. Additionally, researchers should strive to make their research more accessible to the general public, beyond academic journals, scientific conferences, and paywalls. We recommend using open‐access platforms, social media, and other media outlets to disseminate unbiased, evidence‐based research on policing that is digestible to the public.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Public Administration

Reference117 articles.

1. AAPOR. (2023).American Association for Public Opinion Research.https://www‐archive.aapor.org/Education‐Resources/For‐Researchers/Poll‐Survey‐FAQ/Response‐Rates‐An‐Overview.aspx

2. Adams I. T. McCrain J. Schiff D. S. Schiff K. J. &Mourtgos S. M.(2022).Public pressure or peer influence: What shapes police executives’ views on civilian oversight?SocArXiv.https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mdu96

3. Assessing changes in US public trust in science amid the COVID-19 pandemic

4. The road from evidence to policies and the erosion of the standards of democratic scrutiny in the COVID‐19 pandemic;Airoldi G.;History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences,2021

5. Creating Fear

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3