Social cognition differentiates phenocopy syndrome of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia

Author:

van Engelen Marie‐Paule E.12ORCID,Louwers Paulette12,Fieldhouse Jay L. P.12ORCID,Gossink Flora T.3,de Boer Sterre C. M.124,Dols Annemieke56,Scheltens Philip127,Schouws Sigfried N. T. M.8910,Pijnenburg Yolande A. L.12,Vijverberg Everard G. B.12,Krudop Welmoed A.18

Affiliation:

1. Alzheimer Centre Amsterdam, Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Reinier van Arkel, Jeroen Bosch Hospital Hospital and Geriatric Psychiatric Centre Den Bosch The Netherlands

4. The University of Sydney School of Psychology Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. Department of Psychiatry University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

6. Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Mood Anxiety Psychosis Sleep & Stress Program Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands

7. EQT Life Sciences Partners Amsterdam The Netherlands

8. Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry GGZ inGeest Specialised Mental Health Care, Location De Nieuwe Valerius Amsterdam The Netherlands

9. Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Psychiatry Amsterdam The Netherlands

10. Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Mental Health Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPatients displaying clinical features of behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) but lacking both neuroimaging abnormalities and clinical progression are considered to represent the phenocopy syndrome of bvFTD (phFTD). Extensive clinical overlap between early phase bvFTD and phFTD hampers diagnostic distinction. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of clinician‐rated, self‐reported and caregiver‐reported symptoms for clinical distinction between phFTD and bvFTD.MethodsThere were 33 phFTD and 95 probable bvFTD patients included in the study (total N = 128). Clinician‐rated, self‐reported tests and caregiver‐reported symptoms were compared between phFTD and bvFTD on social cognition, behaviour, mood and activities of daily living (ADL). Scores were compared between groups, followed by multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to assess diagnostic value.ResultsUsing clinician‐rated and self‐reported tests, phFTD patients performed better on facial emotion recognition and reported more depressive symptoms. Caregiver‐reported behavioural symptoms indicated higher behavioural and ADL impairment in phFTD compared to bvFTD. Facial emotion recognition provided highest diagnostic accuracy for distinction of phFTD from bvFTD (area under the curve (AUC) 0.813 95% CI 0.735–0.892, P < 0.001, sensitivity 81%, specificity 74%) followed by depressive symptoms (AUC 0.769 95% 0.674–0.864, P < 0.001 sensitivity 81%, specificity of 63%).ConclusionSocial cognition tests are most suitable for distinction of phFTD from bvFTD. Caregiver‐reported questionnaires and phFTD diagnosis seemed inversely correlated, showing more symptoms in phFTD. Further research is needed on phFTD aetiology and in caregivers taking into account disease burden to assess what explains this discrepancy between clinician‐rated and caregiver‐based tools.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3