Cardiac resynchronization therapy for pacing induced cardiomyopathy: Role of baseline right ventricular pacing burden

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated for patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing burden ≥40% (pacing‐induced cardiomyopathy, PICM). It is uncertain whether baseline RV pacing burden impacts response to CRT.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of all CRT upgrades for PICM at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. Univariate and multivariable‐adjusted changes in LVEF, and echocardiographic response (≥10% improvement in LVEF) at 3–12 months post‐CRT upgrade were compared in those with RV pacing burden ≥90% versus <90%.ResultsWe included 75 patients (age 74 ± 11 years, 71% male) who underwent CRT upgrade for PICM. The baseline RV pacing burden was ≥90% in 56 patients (median 99% [IQR 98%–99%]), and <90% in 19 patients (median 79% [IQR 73%–87%]). Improvement in LVEF was greater in those with baseline RV pacing burden ≥90% versus <90% (15.7 ± 9.3% vs. 7.5 ± 9.6%, p = .003). Baseline RV pacing burden ≥90% was a strong predictor of an improvement in LVEF ≥10% after CRT upgrade both in univariate and multivariate‐adjusted models (p = .005 and .02, respectively).ConclusionA higher baseline RV pacing burden predicts a greater improvement in LVEF after CRT upgrade for PICM.