Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Published:2024-02-11 Issue:3 Volume:47 Page:474-480
ISSN:0147-8389
Container-title:Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Pacing Clinical Electrophis

Author:

Qamar Usama¹,Agarwal Siddharth¹^ORCID,Krishan Satyam²,Deshmukh Abhishek³,DeSimone Christopher V.³,Stavrakis Stavros²,Piccini Jonathan P.⁴^ORCID,Ul Abideen Asad Zain²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan

2. Department of Medicine University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma USA

3. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester USA

4. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA

Publisher

Wiley

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/pace.14947

Reference10 articles.

1. Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation

2. Low vulnerability of the right phrenic nerve to electroporation ablation

3. Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation

4. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

5. Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pulsed-field ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: An indirect comparison of effectiveness among three proprietary devices conducted in the absence of randomized trials;International Journal of Cardiology;2024-07

2. Pulsed-Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: An Indirect Comparison of Effectiveness Among Three Proprietary Devices Conducted in the Absence of Randomized Trials;2024