Functionally discrete fine roots differ in microbial assembly, microbial functional potential, and produced metabolites

Author:

King William L.12ORCID,Yates Caylon F.13,Cao Lily134,O'Rourke‐Ibach Sean1,Fleishman Suzanne M.345,Richards Sarah C.136,Centinari Michela34,Hafner Benjamin D.2ORCID,Goebel Marc7,Bauerle Taryn2,Kim Young‐Mo8,Nicora Carrie D.8,Anderton Christopher R.9ORCID,Eissenstat David M.35,Bell Terrence H.13610ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA

2. School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

3. Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Plant Science The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Ecosystem Science and Management The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA

6. Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in International Agriculture and Development The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA

7. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

8. Biological Sciences Division Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington USA

9. Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington USA

10. Department of Physical & Environmental Sciences University of Toronto Scarborough Toronto Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractTraditionally, fine roots were grouped using arbitrary size categories, rarely capturing the heterogeneity in physiology, morphology and functionality among different fine root orders. Fine roots with different functional roles are rarely separated in microbiome‐focused studies and may result in confounding microbial signals and host‐filtering across different root microbiome compartments. Using a 26‐year‐old common garden, we sampled fine roots from four temperate tree species that varied in root morphology and sorted them into absorptive and transportive fine roots. The rhizoplane and rhizosphere were characterized using 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer region amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics for the rhizoplane to identify potential microbial functions. Fine roots were subject to metabolomics to spatially characterize resource availability. Both fungi and bacteria differed according to root functional type. We observed additional differences between the bacterial rhizoplane and rhizosphere compartments for absorptive but not transportive fine roots. Rhizoplane bacteria, as well as the root metabolome and potential microbial functions, differed between absorptive and transportive fine roots, but not the rhizosphere bacteria. Functional differences were driven by sugar transport, peptidases and urea transport. Our data highlights the importance of root function when examining root‐microbial relationships, emphasizing different host selective pressures imparted on different root microbiome compartments.

Funder

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Physiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3