Affiliation:
1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology U.S.A.
Abstract
AbstractDoes capital accumulation increase labor demand and wages? Neoclassical production functions, where capital and labor are q‐complements, ensure that the answer is yes, so long as labor markets are competitive. This result critically depends on the assumption that capital accumulation does not change the technologies being developed and used. I adapt the theory of endogenous technological change to investigate this question when technology also responds to capital accumulation. I show that there are strong parallels between the relationship between capital and wages and existing results on the conditions under which equilibrium factor demands are upward‐sloping (e.g., Acemoglu, Econometrica 75(5) (2007), 1371–410). Extending this framework, I provide intuitive conditions and simple examples where a greater capital stock leads to lower wages, because it triggers more automation. I then offer an endogenous growth model with a menu of technologies where equilibrium involves choices over both the extent of automation and the rate of growth of labor‐augmenting productivity. In this framework, capital accumulation and technological change in the long run are associated with wage growth, but an increase in the saving rate increases the extent of automation, and initially reduces the wage rate and can subsequently depress its long‐run growth rate.
Reference32 articles.
1. Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality;Acemoglu D.;Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998
2. Directed Technical Change;Acemoglu D.;Review of Economic Studies,2002
3. Labor‐ and Capital‐Augmenting Technical Change;Acemoglu D.;Journal of European Economic Association,2003
4. Equilibrium Bias of Technology;Acemoglu D.;Econometrica,2007