Affiliation:
1. University of Exeter U.K.
2. University of Nottingham U.K.
3. Georgetown University U.S.A.
Abstract
AbstractWe explore the implications of unawareness for tort law. We study cases where injurers and victims initially are unaware that some acts can yield harmful consequences, or that some acts or harmful consequences are even possible, but later become aware. We model unawareness by Reverse Bayesianism. We compare the two basic liability rules of Anglo‐American tort law, negligence and strict liability, and argue that negligence has an important advantage over strict liability in a world with unawareness—negligence, through the stipulation of due care standards, spreads awareness about the updated probability of harm.
Reference46 articles.
1. Asymmetric awareness and moral hazard
2. Becker C. K. T.Melkonyan E.Proto A.Sofianos andS. T.Trautmann “Reverse Bayesianism: Revising Beliefs in Light of Unforeseen Events ” Working Paper Adam Smith Business School University of Glasgow 2022.
3. Object‐Based Unawareness: Theory and Applications;Board O.;Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design,2022
4. Toward an Economic Theory of Liability