Abstract
AbstractThere appears to be a general movement away from universal child benefits and towards means‐testing. In the present article we argue that instead of suppressing the labour supply of middle‐income parents by withdrawing the transfer as a function of income, one should consider the alternative of financing a generous universal child benefit by increasing taxation of income. The implications of means‐testing compared with a tax‐financed universal alternative are discussed analytically in a piecewise linear schedule and by combining information from behavioural and non‐behavioural micro‐simulation models. Our results provide support for making child benefit universal instead of means‐tested.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference63 articles.
1. Should we subsidize work? Welfare reform, the earned income tax credit and optimal transfers
2. Children and the US Social Safety Net: Balancing Disincentives for Adults and Benefits for Children
3. ‘The economics of ”tagging” as applied to the optimal income tax, welfare programs, and manpower planning’;Akerlof G. A.;American Economic Review,1978
4. ‘Gender bias in tax systems based on household income’;Andrienko Y.;Annals of Economics and Statistics/Annales d'Economie et de Statistique',2015
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献