Affiliation:
1. Parliament of Australia Canberra Australia
Abstract
AbstractRandomised trials frequently produce surprising findings, overturning conventional wisdom. During the twentieth century, randomised trials became commonplace within medicine, saving millions of lives. Randomised trials within government can now be conducted more cheaply, using administrative data. Just as it might be considered unethical to conduct a randomised trial if a program is indisputably effective, it might be considered unethical not to conduct a rigorous evaluation if a program lacks evidence. Developed within a robust ethical framework, and alongside community consultation, better evaluation can help governments save money and address social disadvantage.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference33 articles.
1. Ames P.andWilson J.2016 ‘Unleashing the potential of randomised controlled trials in Australian governments M‐RCBG Associate Working Paper No. 55 Harvard Kennedy School Cambridge MA’.
2. Arnold Foundation.2015 ‘Arnold Foundation announces expanded funding for low‐cost randomized controlled trials to drive effective social spending’ Laura and John Arnold Foundation Washington DC’.
3. Attia P.andGifford B.2023 ‘Outlive: The science and art of longevity’.Harmony New York.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Data and evaluation: A match made in policy heaven;Australian Journal of Social Issues;2023-11-03