From de jure to de facto transparency: Analyzing the compliance gap in light of freedom of information laws

Author:

Trautendorfer Julia1ORCID,Hohensinn Lisa2ORCID,Hilgers Dennis1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Johannes Kepler University Linz Linz Austria

2. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business Vienna Austria

Abstract

AbstractFreedom of information (FOI) laws empower citizens to access public information from public organizations, enhancing government transparency and accountability. Previous studies have evaluated government transparency and FOI compliance based on the proactive release of information and governments' responses to citizens' requests. This study extends prior research by focusing on regulatory compliance mechanisms in German public organizations. Specifically, it investigates how these organizations respond to information requests under varying legislative frameworks across Germany's 16 states (Länder). Based on six legal elements (de jure provisions), we examine FOI law stringency and investigate their association with government responsiveness to approximate de facto regulatory compliance. Based on an analysis of over 100,000 requests directed at more than 7000 German public sector organizations, we find that not all six legal elements are directly associated with responsiveness. Only those elements that signify a broader organizational commitment to transparency are linked to higher responsiveness. This study contributes to public sector transparency literature by highlighting the complex interplay between variations in FOI laws and actual compliance, and underscores the need for further research on the assumed causal relationship between FOI law stringency and transparency outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference91 articles.

1. The global explosion of Freedom of Information laws;Ackerman J.;Administrative Law Review,2006

2. How far can mandatory requirements drive increased levels of disclosure?

3. When does open government shut? Predicting government responses to citizen information requests

4. The impact of online Freedom of Information tools: What is the evidence?;Bailur S.;MySociety,2014

5. Freedom of Information Around the World 2006: A Global Survey of Access to Government Information Laws

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3