Affiliation:
1. Department of International Affairs University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
Abstract
AbstractHow does communism as an ideology fare in the post‐reform digital age China? What are the implications for China's ideological governance? Through online ethnographic work and text analysis, this paper identifies and analyzes how communism as an ideation and a practice is (re)memorized, (re)presented, and (re)interpreted in popular online fictions. In doing so, it reveals how such “communism nostalgia” passes on the “red genes,” shaping citizens' understanding of history, the communist ideology, and their expectations toward the current regime. The popular trend creates a predicament of ideological governance for the Chinese regime by allowing it to garner historical legitimacy while also questioning the very nature of the regime today—to what extent has it deviated from its ideological root? By focusing on everyday politics of digital experiences, the article approaches authoritarian ideological governance from a nonconventional perspective, highlighting the agency of ordinary citizens in the process.
Reference97 articles.
1. Strategies for state‐firm co‐production of China's social credit system;Ahmed S.;Regulation & Governance
2. Information technology and public commenting on agency regulations;Balla S. J.;Regulation & Governance,2007
3. Bandurski D.(2021 May 18).Red genes.The CMP Dictionary.https://chinamediaproject.org/the_ccp_dictionary/red-genes/
4. Bandurski D.(2022 September 7).Mixing science and politics.China Newspeak.https://chinamediaproject.org/2022/09/07/mixing-science-and-politics/
5. Taxation without Representation in Contemporary Rural China