Affiliation:
1. Department of International Economics, Government and Business Copenhagen Business School Frederiksberg Denmark
2. Watson Institute for International & Public Affairs Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA
Abstract
AbstractChina is simultaneously enacting a state‐led financialization of governance and a prioritization of environmental objectives. Resultingly, dedicated state‐backed green funds have grown in scale beyond US$70 billion. Drawing on interviews, policies, and financial databases, we examine these funds through policy document analysis, descriptive statistics, and three case studies. Tying together the literature on “financialization” and the “green state” we show how China's “market‐driven, government‐guided” type of state‐led financialization enhances the country's green state investment capacity. This is distinct from other countries' experience of diminishing capacities resulting from financialization of the state. We introduce the concept of a “green investor state” to capture China's approach and argue that the approach is difficult to replicate beyond state‐capitalist economies. However, the gradual return of industrial policy elsewhere makes the use of similar funds increasingly feasible globally, warranting further research on the use of green funds under none‐state‐led types of financialization.
Reference114 articles.
1. Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century
2. Ao J.(2022).The 88.5 billion national environmental protection fund of funds will be released again! In the first quarter the fund has spent 1 billion yuan to leverage a large order of 50 billion yuan. [885亿元国家级环保母基金再出手!Q1刚斥10亿元撬动500亿元大单].http://stock.stockstar.com/IG2022050700009656.shtml
3. The Rise of State Capital
4. Rethinking the Green State
5. Re-thinking the Fiscal and Monetary Political Economy of the Green State