Affiliation:
1. University of Adelaide
Abstract
AbstractThis article reflects on an ethical and revelatory moment in the development of my long‐term fieldwork relationships with people of the Lihir Islands in Papua New Guinea. Ethnographic research globally is now shaped through formal processes of ethical review, with the requirements for informed consent, privacy, and consideration of harm and beneficence. Researchers then have to put these procedures into practice, often encountering the need to weigh competing ethical principles, particularly when unforeseen events occur. Reflexivity has been argued to be crucial on these occasions. Yet both ethical codes and reflexivity fall short of managing ethical and relational implications of long‐term field relationships. This article suggests that the concept of solidarity as theorized recently in bioethics may be helpful, particularly the discernment of three layers of relationship. What responsibilities might we as anthropologists have to the people we work with that go beyond procedural ethics? And how do moments such as the one described in this article shape ongoing field research?
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology
Reference87 articles.
1. Research ethics across disciplines
2. Australian Anthropological Society2012.AAS Code of Ethics(available onlinehttps://www.aas.asn.au/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=143481&module_id=395252 accessed 19 May 2023).
3. Resisting Commensurability: Against Informed Consent as an Anthropological Virtue
4. Comment;Bell K.;Current Anthropology,2019
5. Facing Risk: Levinas, Ethnography, and Ethics