What matters most to older adults: Racial and ethnic considerations in values for current healthcare planning

Author:

Heintz Hannah L.1,Paik Julie M.234,Baird Lola3,Driver Jane A.234,Moye Jennifer235ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA

2. New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) Boston Massachusetts USA

3. VA Boston Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Psychiatry Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundClarifying what matters most informs current care planning for adults with multiple comorbidities. We describe how adults aged 55+ rate what matters most and differences in Black and White participants.MethodsParticipants (N = 247, Age M = 63.61 ± 5.26) who self‐identified as Black (n = 89), White (n = 96), or other racial and ethnic groups (n = 62) completed an online survey. Healthcare values in four domains, (1) important factors for managing health, (2) functioning, (3) enjoying life, and (4) connecting, were assessed with the What Matters Most‐Structured Tool. Frailty was assessed with the FRAIL scale.ResultsConcerns about pain and finances were rated as the most influential when making healthcare decisions across groups. Black participants rated religious and racial, ethnic, and cultural considerations as more important in healthcare decision‐making than did White participants (Black participant M = 1.93 ± 0.85 vs. White participant M = 1.26 ± 0.52), citing concerns about health equity, disparity, and representation. Across the sample, specific aspects of functioning (e.g., ability to think clearly, walk, and see) and connecting (e.g., with family and friends and with God) were highly valued. Black participants rated the ability to dress or bathe, exercise, and connect with God as more important than did White participants, and they were also more likely to rate length of life as more important relative to quality of life. Value ratings were not associated with other demographic or health factors.ConclusionsAdults aged 55+ from diverse groups highly value functioning and connections when making health decisions, with important contextual distinctions between Black participants and White participants. This study population was relatively young; future studies in older populations are needed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Reference47 articles.

1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI).What Is an Age‐Friendly Health System? Published 2022. Accessed November 1 2022.https://www.ihi.org:443/Engage/Initiatives/Age-Friendly-Health-Systems/Pages/default.aspx

2. The Geriatrics 5M's: A New Way of Communicating What We Do

3. TinettiM NaikA DindoL.Conversation Guide for Patients and Caregivers for Identifying Their Health Priorities. Published online 2018:26.

4. Patient Priority–Directed Decision Making and Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions

5. Health Values and Treatment Goals of Older, Multimorbid Adults Facing Life-Threatening Illness

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3