Retention in care for type 2 diabetes management in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A systematic review

Author:

Garrib Anupam1ORCID,Njim Tsi2,Adeyemi Olukemi2,Moyo Faith2,Halloran Natalie2,Luo Huanyuan2,Wang Duolao1,Okebe Joseph2,Bates Katie23,Santos Victor Santana45,Ramaiya Kaushik6,Jaffar Shabbar7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Sciences Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Liverpool UK

2. Department of International Public Health Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Liverpool UK

3. Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

4. Department of Medicine Federal University of Sergipe Lagarto Brazil

5. Health Science Graduate Program Federal University of Sergipe Aracaju Brazil

6. Shree Hindu Mandal Hospital Dar es Salaam Tanzania

7. UCL Institute for Global Health University College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveDiabetes prevalence has risen rapidly in Sub‐Saharan Africa, but rates of retention in diabetes care are poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine rates of retention in care of persons with type 2 diabetes.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Global Health and CINAHL online databases for cohort studies and randomised control trials (RCTs) published up to 12 October 2021, that reported retention in or attrition from care for patients with type 2 diabetes in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Retention was defined as persons diagnosed with diabetes who were alive and in care or with a known outcome, while attrition was defined as loss from care.ResultsFrom 6559 articles identified, after title and abstract screening, 209 articles underwent full text review. Forty six papers met the inclusion criteria, comprising 22,610 participants. Twenty one articles were of RCTs of which 8 trials had 1 year or more of follow‐up and 25 articles were of non‐randomised studies of which 19 had 12 months or more of follow‐up. A total of 11 studies (5 RCTs and 6 non‐randomised) were assessed to be of good quality. Sixteen RCTs were done in secondary or tertiary care settings. Their pooled retention rate (95% CI) was 80% (77%, 84%) in the control arm. Four RCTs had been done in primary care settings and their pooled retention rate (95% CI) was 53% (45%, 62%) in the control arm. The setting of one trial was unclear. For non‐randomised studies, retention rates (95% CI) were 68% (62%, 75%) among 19 studies done in secondary and tertiary care settings, and 40% (33%, 49%) among the 6 studies done in primary care settings.ConclusionRates of retention in care of people living with diabetes are poor in primary care research settings.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Parasitology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3