Changes in Numbers of Glomerular Macrophages Between Two Consecutive Biopsies and the Association With Renal Transplant Graft Survival

Author:

Nasic Salmir12ORCID,Mölne Johan34,Eriksson Marie5,Stegmayr Bernd6,Afghahi Henri17,Peters Björn17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine Institute of Medicine the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

2. Research, Education, Development and Innovation Department Skaraborg Hospital Region Västra Götaland Skövde Sweden

3. Department of Laboratory Medicine Institute of Biomedicine University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

4. Clinical Pathology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Region Västra Götaland Gothenburg Sweden

5. Department of Statistics Umeå School of Business Economics and Statistics Umeå University Umeå Sweden

6. Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University Umeå Sweden

7. Department of Nephrology Skaraborg Hospital Region Västra Götaland Skövde Sweden

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundMacrophages are involved in kidney transplants. The aim of the study was to investigate if changes exist in the levels of glomerular macrophage index (GMI) between two consecutive kidney transplant biopsies, and if so to determine their potential impact on graft survival.MethodsTwo consecutive biopsies were performed on the same renal graft in 623 patients. GMI was categorized into three GMI classes: ≤1.8 Low, 1.9–4.5 Medium, and ≥4.6 High. This division yielded nine possible switches between the first and second biopsies (Low‐Low, Low‐Medium, etc.). Cox‐regressions were used and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) are presented.ResultsThe worst graft survival was observed in the High‐High group, and the best graft survival was observed in the Low‐Low and High‐Low groups. Compared to the High‐High group, a reduction of risk was observed in nearly all other decreasing groups (reductions between 65% and 80% of graft loss). After adjustment for covariates, the risk for graft‐loss was lower in the Low‐Low (HR = 0.24, CI 0.13–0.46), Low‐Medium (HR = 0.25, CI 0.11–0.55), Medium‐Low (HR = 0.29, CI 0.11–0.77), and the High‐Low GMI (HR = 0.31, CI 0.10–0.98) groups compared to the High‐High group as the reference.ConclusionsGMI may change dynamically, and the latest finding is of most prognostic importance. GMI should be considered in all evaluations of biopsy findings since high or increasing GMI levels are associated with shorter graft survival. Future studies need to consider therapeutic strategies to lower or maintain a low GMI. A high GMI besides a vague histological finding should be considered as a warning sign requiring more frequent clinical follow up.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3