Exploring morphometric transformations in temperature‐sensitive NiTi instruments alongside real‐time intracanal temperature dynamics

Abstract

AbstractAimThis study was twofold: (i) it aimed to investigate the morphometric changes of three temperature‐sensitive nickel–titanium (NiTi) instruments at different temperatures, and (ii) to conduct an in vivo real‐time analysis of intracanal temperature changes.MethodsChanges in the shape and length of XP‐Endo Shaper, XP‐Endo Finisher, and XP‐Endo Finisher‐R were evaluated in real time whilst heated in a temperature‐controlled water bath from 22 to 45°C. Instruments were fixed to a laminated water‐resistant 1 mm graph paper attached to a stone block. Instruments were imaged whilst subjected to increasing temperature using a digital camera attached to an operating microscope. From recorded videos, still frames were extracted at 10‐s intervals and changes in the length and shape of each instrument were measured and changes were plotted against time. Moreover, the intracanal temperature of distal roots of lower molars was measured in vivo for patients attending the clinic for non‐surgical root canal treatments. The temperature was measured using a K‐type thermocouple probe inserted into the mid‐root level after irrigating the canal with a solution set at room temperature (22°C) or heated to 45°C. The intraoral and intracanal temperatures were recorded using a video camera for 180 s at 5‐s intervals to plot the change in the intraoral and intracanal temperature, after both irrigation solution temperatures, with time.ResultsThe shape transformation of XP‐Endo Shaper began at 31.5 ± 2.0°C and reached its optimal transformation at 35.1 ± 1.0°C. For the Finisher and Finisher‐R, shape transformations began at 29.2 ± 1.9 and 26.9 ± 2.2°C reaching the optimal transformation at 33.9 ± 1.4 and 32.7 ± 1.7°C, respectively. The average decreases in lengths of XP‐Endo Shaper, Finisher, and Finisher‐R after full transformation were 0.43 ± 0.23, 1.07 ± 0.22, and 1.15 ± 0.22 mm, respectively. The intracanal temperature reached 32.9 ± 0.8 and 33.2 ± 1.0°C after 3 min of application of irrigation solutions set at 22 or 45°C, respectively.ConclusionThe tested instruments exhibited diverse changes in their shapes and lengths at varying temperatures. Despite the temperature of the irrigation solution, the intracanal temperature consistently remained lower than the intracanal temperature once equilibrium was reached. This highlights the importance of considering the temperature of irrigation solution during in vitro testing of endodontic instruments.