Affiliation:
1. Australian Centre of Excellence for Children and Families across the Life Course Brisbane Queensland Australia
2. Institute for Social Science Research University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
3. Health and Wellbeing Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
4. Queensland Brain Institute University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundIn developed economies, most children attend Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) services before school entry, many from early life and across long days. For this reason, ECEC services present significant potential to provide food environments that positively influence eating behaviours and food preferences with attendant effect on life course trajectories of health and wellbeing. Yet there is evidence that feeding practices that limit optimal ongoing nutrition, such as pressure and restriction, are amplified in ECEC services serving disadvantaged communities. We sought to identify underlying explanatory mechanisms through observation of children's feeding experiences and educator explanations comparing, family‐provided and service‐provided meals.MethodThis study used qualitative analyses of educator interviews and observation records from 55 mealtimes in 10 ECEC services: 5 providing food and 5 requiring family food provision.ResultsHigh levels of concern drove educator's controlling feeding practices at mealtimes but presented differently across meal provision modes. In centres that provided food, educators' concern focused on food variety, manifesting in pressure to ‘try’ foods. In centres requiring family‐provided food, concern focused on nutrition quantity and quality and manifested as control of order of food consumption and pacing of intake to ensure food lasted across the day. Interview data suggested that conflict aversion limited optimal nutrition. In centres providing food, this was seen in menus that prioritized child food preferences. In centres requiring family meal provision, conflict aversion was seen as reticence to discuss lunchbox contents with families.ConclusionThe findings direct attention to public health intervention. Currently, ECEC face significant barriers to realizing their potential to support child nutrition and establish positive life course trajectories of nutrition. To do so requires targeted supports that enable sufficient supply and quality of food in the context of poverty.
Funder
ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference58 articles.
1. Observations of food consumption in a daycare setting
2. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2017).Is your baby hungry or full? Responsive feeding explained.
3. Developing measures of food and nutrition security within an Australian context
4. Hunger in the household: Food insecurity and associations with maternal eating and toddler feeding
5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016).Socio‐economic indexes for areas. Available from:https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/seifa