Mealtimes in the context of poverty: Comparison of ECEC services providing food and those requiring food provided from home

Author:

Searle Bonnie12ORCID,Staton Sally1ORCID,Littlewood Robyn3ORCID,Thorpe Karen14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australian Centre of Excellence for Children and Families across the Life Course Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Institute for Social Science Research University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. Health and Wellbeing Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. Queensland Brain Institute University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn developed economies, most children attend Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) services before school entry, many from early life and across long days. For this reason, ECEC services present significant potential to provide food environments that positively influence eating behaviours and food preferences with attendant effect on life course trajectories of health and wellbeing. Yet there is evidence that feeding practices that limit optimal ongoing nutrition, such as pressure and restriction, are amplified in ECEC services serving disadvantaged communities. We sought to identify underlying explanatory mechanisms through observation of children's feeding experiences and educator explanations comparing, family‐provided and service‐provided meals.MethodThis study used qualitative analyses of educator interviews and observation records from 55 mealtimes in 10 ECEC services: 5 providing food and 5 requiring family food provision.ResultsHigh levels of concern drove educator's controlling feeding practices at mealtimes but presented differently across meal provision modes. In centres that provided food, educators' concern focused on food variety, manifesting in pressure to ‘try’ foods. In centres requiring family‐provided food, concern focused on nutrition quantity and quality and manifested as control of order of food consumption and pacing of intake to ensure food lasted across the day. Interview data suggested that conflict aversion limited optimal nutrition. In centres providing food, this was seen in menus that prioritized child food preferences. In centres requiring family meal provision, conflict aversion was seen as reticence to discuss lunchbox contents with families.ConclusionThe findings direct attention to public health intervention. Currently, ECEC face significant barriers to realizing their potential to support child nutrition and establish positive life course trajectories of nutrition. To do so requires targeted supports that enable sufficient supply and quality of food in the context of poverty.

Funder

ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference58 articles.

1. Observations of food consumption in a daycare setting

2. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2017).Is your baby hungry or full? Responsive feeding explained.

3. Developing measures of food and nutrition security within an Australian context

4. Hunger in the household: Food insecurity and associations with maternal eating and toddler feeding

5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016).Socio‐economic indexes for areas. Available from:https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/seifa

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3