Airway topicalization in pediatric anesthesia: An international cross‐sectional study

Author:

Iliff H. A.12ORCID,Baxter A.3,Chakladar A.4ORCID,Endlich Y.5ORCID,McGuire B.6ORCID,Peyton J.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Cardiff UK

2. Health Education and Improvement Wales Cardiff UK

3. Department of Anaesthesia Royal Hospital for Children and Young People Edinburgh UK

4. Department of Anaesthesia University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust Brighton UK

5. Department of Anaesthesia Royal Adelaide Women's and Children's Hospital South Australia Adelaide Australia

6. Department of Anaesthesia Ninewells Hospital Dundee UK

7. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine Boston Children's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere is no national or international consensus or guideline on recommended dosing of lidocaine for airway topicalization in children. Doses quoted in the literature vary substantially.AimsThe primary aim of the study was to ascertain current international dosing practices (mg.kg−1 and concentration of solution) for lidocaine airway topicalization in children. The secondary aims included examining aftercare instructions for those receiving lidocaine airway topicalization and instances of local anesthetic systemic toxicity secondary to the use of lidocaine for airway topicalization in pediatric patients.MethodsThis cross‐sectional study consisted of 11–20 questions across three domains—population demographics, clinical practice, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity. It adhered to the consensus‐based checklist for reporting of survey studies. Responses were collected over 14 weeks using a combination of probability (cluster and simple random) and nonprobability (purposive, convenience and snowball) sampling. Data were analyzed based on the response rate per question with proportions expressed as percentages and nonparametric data expressed as median (interquartile range [range]) in an effort to minimize nonresponse error. No weighting of items or propensity scoring was applied.ResultsAfter initial exclusions, 1501 participants from 69 countries, across six continents, were included. Consultant anesthetists or those with an equivalent level of experience accounted for 1262/1501 (84.1%) of responses. Results showed heterogeneity in dosing and timing regimens and evidence that dosing may contribute to adverse outcomes. The maximum dose reported by participants who use lidocaine for airway topicalization as part of their normal practice was 5 mg.kg−1 (4–6 mg.kg−1 [0.5–50]) median (interquartile range [range]) over 2 h (1‐4 h [0–30]).ConclusionThe results support the need for further research and consensus in this area, in order to provide safe provision of lidocaine airway topicalization in children. It is hoped the results of this study can support future collaborative work in this area.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3