Abstract
AbstractAccording to Eusebius, the famous Edessene thinker Bardaisan wrote his work On Fate in a time of persecution and addressed it to a figure named Antoninus (HE 4.30). It is commonly surmised that this ‘Antoninus’ was a Roman emperor who sanctioned Christian persecution in some way. But scholars have varied in their interpretations. Some have identified this figure as Caracalla, who visited Edessa in 216–217. But since Eusebius situated Bardaisan's activity in the reign of Marcus Aurelius, he is often deemed to be the Antoninus in question. As this article surmises, the testimony of Eusebius and other late antique authors, like Epiphanius, reflect certain memories both of the integration of Edessa into the Roman provincial system under Caracalla and the social tensions that it raised. But largely due to Eusebius' narrative, late antique authors conceived of Marcus Aurelius as the ‘Antoninus’ to whom Bardaisan reportedly addressed On Fate and other apologetic work, and they created social memories of Bardaisan as a would-be confessor in a context of persecution.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Archaeology,History,Language and Linguistics,Archaeology,Classics
Reference103 articles.
1. Gregorii Barhebraei Chronicon ecclesiasticum: The Ecclesiastical Chronicle of Barhebraeus;Abbeloos,2012
2. ‘Sextus Julius Africanus and the Roman Near East in the third century’;Adler;JTS,2004
3. ‘Eusebius' critique of Africanus’;Adler,2006
4. ‘The kingdom of Edessa and the creation of a Christian aristocracy’;Adler,2013
5. ‘The creation of Christian elite culture in Roman Syria and the Near East’;Adler,2017
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献