Australian fresh frozen plasma audit: A National Blood Transfusion Committee and Blood Matters collaboration

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere is a paucity of high‐quality data to guide appropriate fresh frozen plasma transfusion with current recommendations based on consensus opinion. The limitations of the product and testing modalities are poorly understood with the rare but potentially serious side effects underappreciated. Combined this has resulted in the widespread misuse of FFP.Study Design and MethodsRetrospective data capturing FFP transfusion within the 12‐month period of April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023 was entered by Australian health care providers. Appropriate transfusion was assessed by the adjudicators and defined as one in keeping with current recommendations. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using SAS Studio version 9.4.ResultsDuring the study period, 935 FFP transfusion episodes were captured. The most frequent indications for FFP were massive hemorrhage 344 (37%), bleeding 141 (15%), and preoperative use 90 (10%). Males received 534 (60%) transfusions. Critical care specialists were the largest users of FFP, prescribing 568 (63%) of transfusions.FFP was used appropriately in 546 (61%) transfusions. However, when massive hemorrhage was excluded only 202 (37%) transfusions were appropriate. Patients with an INR <1.5 received 37% of transfusions. Transfusion associated adverse events were reported in 2% (15) of transfusions including two non‐fatal anaphylactic reactions.DiscussionThis audit assesses the appropriate use of FFP across all major clinical indications and provides the largest body of evidence of Australian plasma transfusion practices. It highlights the widespread misuse of FFP, which is predominantly guided by consensus recommendations due to a lack of high‐quality data.