Result reporting and early discontinuation of sepsis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov

Author:

Hu Handan1ORCID,Wang Xinyi2,Huang Peng34

Affiliation:

1. Queen Mary School Nanchang University Nanchang P. R. China

2. Chinese Evidence‐Based Medicine Center West China Hospital Chengdu P. R. China

3. Center for Evidence‐Based Medicine, School of Public Health Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi P. R. China

4. Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health Nanchang University Nanchang P. R. China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveSepsis is a leading cause of death from infectious disease or traumatic injury. The prevalence and predictor of results underreporting and early stop of sepsis clinical trials remain poorly studied. To fill the gap, we designed this study to characterize sepsis clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, particularly to recognize features related to premature discontinuation and lack of results reporting.MethodsWe searched ClinicalTrials.gov to include interventional sepsis trials up to July 8, 2022. All structured data of the identified trials were extracted and reviewed. A descriptive analysis was conducted. Cox and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the significance of the association of trial characteristics with early termination and lack of results reporting.ResultsA total of 1654 records were identified, among which 1061 eligible trials were reserved. Results underreporting happened in 91.6% of these sepsis interventional trials. 12.0% were discontinued. Moreover, factors that led to the higher risk of discontinuation were the US‐registered clinical research and the small sample size. The factor that contributed to results underreporting was non‐US‐registered clinical trials.ConclusionThe frequent discontinuation and underreporting of sepsis trials have highly impaired the progress of sepsis management and studies. Therefore, solutions to early discontinuation and improving the quality of results dissemination remain an urgent problem.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Sepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches

2. Sepsis, a 2020 review for the internist;Purcarea A;Rom J Intern Med,2020

3. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

4. The immunology of sepsis

5. LiangL MooreB SoniA.National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer 2017 [Internet].2017. Available from:www.cms.gov/Research‐Statistics‐Data‐

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3