Affiliation:
1. Department of Health Policy and Management School of Public Health Peking University Beijing China
2. Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis MO, U.S. St. Louis United States
3. Department of Health Services Research and Policy London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London UK
4. School of Public Health Peking University Beijing China
5. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics School of Public Health Peking University Beijing China
6. Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness and Response Beijing China
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThe COVID‐19 vaccination strategy has been widely used to protect population health worldwide. This study aims to summarize the cost‐effectiveness evidence of economic evaluation of COVID‐19 vaccination strategies to provide evidence supporting the usage of COVID‐19 vaccination, especially where the supply of COVID‐19 vaccine is limited.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed by searching both English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, and CNKI. Articles published from January 1, 2020 to August 1, 2022 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022355442).ResultsOf the 1035 papers identified, a total of 28 English studies that met the preset criteria were included. COVID‐19 vaccination and booster vaccination were cost‐effective or cost‐saving regardless of the vaccine type; vaccine efficacy, vaccine price, vaccine supply or prioritization, and vaccination pace were the influential factors of cost‐effectiveness among different population groups. When supply is adequate, mass vaccination should be encouraged, while when supply is inadequate, prioritizing the high risk and the elderly is more cost‐effective.ConclusionsCOVID‐19 vaccination strategies are economically favorable in a wide range of countries and population groups, and further research on suitable strategies for booster COVID‐19 vaccination is needed.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献