Cost‐effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccination: A systematic review

Author:

Fu Yaqun1ORCID,Zhao Jingyu1ORCID,Han Peien1ORCID,Zhang Jiawei1,Wang Quan12ORCID,Wang Qingbo1,Wei Xia3ORCID,Yang Li1ORCID,Ren Tao4,Zhan Siyan5,Li Liming56

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy and Management School of Public Health Peking University Beijing China

2. Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis MO, U.S. St. Louis United States

3. Department of Health Services Research and Policy London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London UK

4. School of Public Health Peking University Beijing China

5. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics School of Public Health Peking University Beijing China

6. Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness and Response Beijing China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe COVID‐19 vaccination strategy has been widely used to protect population health worldwide. This study aims to summarize the cost‐effectiveness evidence of economic evaluation of COVID‐19 vaccination strategies to provide evidence supporting the usage of COVID‐19 vaccination, especially where the supply of COVID‐19 vaccine is limited.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed by searching both English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, and CNKI. Articles published from January 1, 2020 to August 1, 2022 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022355442).ResultsOf the 1035 papers identified, a total of 28 English studies that met the preset criteria were included. COVID‐19 vaccination and booster vaccination were cost‐effective or cost‐saving regardless of the vaccine type; vaccine efficacy, vaccine price, vaccine supply or prioritization, and vaccination pace were the influential factors of cost‐effectiveness among different population groups. When supply is adequate, mass vaccination should be encouraged, while when supply is inadequate, prioritizing the high risk and the elderly is more cost‐effective.ConclusionsCOVID‐19 vaccination strategies are economically favorable in a wide range of countries and population groups, and further research on suitable strategies for booster COVID‐19 vaccination is needed.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality

Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3