Effectiveness of an articulating laparoscopic needle holder for cesarean scar defect repair

Abstract

AbstractAimTo evaluate the efficacy of an articulating laparoscopic needle holder in laparoscopic surgery for cesarean scar defect.MethodsWe performed a retrospective case–control study at the Shiga University of Medical Science. Patients who underwent laparoscopic uterine scar repair were divided into an articulating laparoscopic needle holder (ArtiSential®) group and a rigid needle holder (conventional) group to compare the suture and total operative times. Uterine myometrial suturing involves a double‐layer interrupted suture, including a modified Gambee suture for the first layer. We measured the residual myometrial thickness using magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively.ResultsBoth groups comprised 10 patients each. The time per stitch for the first and second layers was significantly shorter in the ArtiSential group than in the conventional group (median 208 s vs. 403 s, p < 0.0001 and median 17 s vs. 29 s; p < 0.0001, respectively). The total operating time was significantly shorter in the ArtiSential group (mean 188 min vs. 240 min, p = 0.0015). The postoperative residual myometrial thickness (mean 9.1 mm in the ArtiSential group and 9.6 mm in the conventional group) was significantly higher than the preoperative residual myometrial thickness (mean 1.6 mm in the ArtiSential group and 1.6 mm in the conventional group) (p < 0.0001 in both groups).ConclusionsAn articulating needle holder is useful in laparoscopic surgery for cesarean scar defect, especially when a modified Gambee suture is required.