Affiliation:
1. Medical Center for Digestive Diseases Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
2. Department of Gastroenterology Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Wuxi China
3. Medical Center for Digestive Diseases Huaian First People's Hospital Huaian China
4. Department of Gastroenterology First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University Guangzhou China
5. Fourth Department of the Digestive Disease Center Suining Central Hospital Suining China
6. Key Lab of Holistic Integrative Enterology Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
Abstract
AbstractBackground and AimFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been shown to positively affect the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the safety and efficacy of FMT may depend on the route of microbiota delivery. This study investigates the acceptance, satisfaction, and selection preference of a new delivery route, transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET), for treating IBD.MethodsA survey was conducted among patients with IBD from five medical centers across China. The objective was to assess their acceptance, subjective feelings, and major concerns regarding two types of TET: colonic TET and mid‐gut TET. In addition, the survey also analyzed the factors affecting the selection of TET and TET types among these patients.ResultsThe final analysis included 351 questionnaires. Up to 76.6% of patients were willing to accept TET and preferred to choose colonic TET when they first learned about TET. Patients with longer disease duration, history of enema therapy, or enteral nutrition were more open to considering TET among IBD patients. After treatment, 95.6% of patients were satisfied with TET, including colonic TET (95.9%) and mid‐gut TET (95.1%). Patients with a history of enema therapy and ulcerative colitis preferred colonic TET. In contrast, those with a history of enteral nutrition and Crohn's disease were willing to choose mid‐gut TET. However, some patients hesitated to accept TET due to concerns about efficacy, safety, and cost.ConclusionsTET was highly accepted and satisfied patients with IBD. Disease type and combination therapy influenced the choice of colonic or mid‐gut TET.
Subject
Gastroenterology,Hepatology
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献