Effect of volume of instillate on the diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in patients with suspected chronic pulmonary aspergillosis—A pilot study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) galactomannan (GM) is commonly used to diagnose Aspergillus‐related lung diseases. However, unlike serum GM, which is measured in undiluted blood, BAL‐GM is estimated using variable aliquots and cumulative volume of instillates during bronchoscopy.ObjectiveSince different studies have reported varying diagnostic accuracy and cut‐offs for BAL‐GM in CPA, we hypothesized that the total volume of instillate and ‘order/label’ of aliquots significantly affects the BAL‐GM values, which was evaluated as part of this study.Patients & MethodsWe obtained 250 BAL samples from 50 patients (five from each) with suspected chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. BAL fluid was collected after instilling sequential volumes of 40 mL of normal saline each for the first four labels and a fifth label was prepared by mixing 1 mL from each of the previous labels. The GM level of each label was measured by PLATELIA™ ASPERGILLUS Ag enzyme immunoassay. This study measured the discordance, level of agreement, diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity and AUROC) and best cut‐offs for BAL‐GM in the different aliquots of lavage fluid.ResultsThe study population, classified into CPA (28%) and non‐CPA (72%) groups, based on ERS/ESCMID criteria (excluding BAL‐GM) were not different with respect to clinico‐radiological characteristics. The discordance of BAL‐GM positivity (using a cut‐off of >1) between the serial labels for the same patient ranged between 10% and 22%, while the discordance between classification using BAL‐GM positivity (using a cut‐off of ≥1) and clinic‐radio‐microbiological classification ranged between 18% and 30%. The level of agreement for serial labels was at best fair (<0.6 for all except one ‘label’). The AUROC for the serial samples ranged between 0.595 and 0.702, with the ‘40 mL and the ‘mix’ samples performing the best. The best BAL‐GM cut‐off also showed significant variation between serial labels of varying dilutions (Range:1.01 ‐ 4.26).InterpretationThis study highlights the variation in BAL‐GM measured and the ‘positivity’ between different ‘labels’ of aliquots of BAL, with the first aliquot and the mixed sample showing the best performances for diagnosis of CPA. Future studies should attempt to ‘standardise’ the instilled volume for BAL‐GM estimation to standardise the diagnostic yield.