Can roscovitine and trichostatin A be alternatives to standard protocols for cell cycle synchronization of ovine adult and foetal fibroblast cells?

Author:

Yagcioglu Selin1ORCID,Ersoy Nur2ORCID,Demir Kamber1ORCID,Birler Sema1ORCID,Pabuccuoglu Serhat1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Istanbul University‐Cerrahpasa Avcılar, Istanbul Turkey

2. Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Institute of Graduate Studies Istanbul University‐Cerrahpasa Avcılar, Istanbul Turkey

Abstract

AbstractSynchronization of donor cells is an important step for the success of somatic cell nuclear transfer application and facilitates the development of embryos. Contact inhibition, serum starvation and different chemical agents are used in synchronizing different types of somatic cells. In this study, to synchronize the primary ovine adult (POF) and foetal (POFF) fibroblast cells to G0/G1 phases, the contact inhibition, the serum starvation, roscovitine and trichostatin A (TSA) methods were used. In the first part of the study, roscovitine (10, 15, 20 and 30 μM) and TSA (25, 50, 75 and 100 nM) were applied for 24 h to determine the optimal concentration for POF and POFF cells. In the second part, optimal concentrations of roscovitine and TSA for these cells were compared with contact inhibition and serum starvation methods. Cell cycle distribution and apoptotic activity analysis were performed by flow cytometry to compare this synchronization methods. Serum starvation method resulted in higher cell synchronization rate in both cells compared to other groups. Although contact inhibition and TSA also achieved high success rates of synchronized cell value, it was observed that the difference between serum starvation and these groups was significant (p < .05). When the apoptosis rates of the two cell types were examined, it was observed that the early apoptotic cells in contact inhibition and late apoptotic cells in the serum starvation were higher than the other groups (p < .05). Although the 10 and 15 μM concentrations of roscovitine gave the lowest apoptosis rates, it was observed that it failed to synchronize both the ovine fibroblast cells to G0/G1 phase. As a result, it was concluded that while roscovitine was not successful to synchronize both the POFF and POF cell lines, TSA (50 nM for POF cells and 100 nM for POFF cells) can be used efficiently as an alternative to the contact inhibition and the serum starvation methods.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Animal Science and Zoology,Biotechnology

Reference37 articles.

1. How does p53 induce apoptosis and how does this relate to p53-mediated tumour suppression?

2. Production of cloned lambs: Transfer of early cleavage stage embryos to final recipients;Birler S.;İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi,2010

3. Flow Cytometric Cell Cycle Analysis of Cultured Porcine Fetal Fibroblast Cells1

4. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3