Author:
Jeanneret Richard,Silzer Rob
Abstract
Individual Psychological Assessment is widely practiced among I–O psychologists and supported as a core competency by a majority of the commentaries. Our response addresses some of the key points made in the commentaries, such as issues related to the definition, contextual and criterion variables, interpretation and integration methods, validity evidence, professional matters, and future research directions. We also respond to a few critics who want to entirely eliminate expert assessor judgment in IPAs. Models are presented for using assessor judgment and mechanical methods in IPAs and for distinguishing naïve and sophisticated IPA researchers and practitioners. We conclude that IPA is now widely accepted as a core part of I–O psychology.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference27 articles.
1. Roller, R. L. , & Morris, S. B. (2008). Meta-analysis of the relationship between individual assessments and job performance. Unpublished paper.
2. The Validity of Individual Psychological Assessments
3. The Meta-Analysis of Clinical Judgment Project
4. Evidence-based practice in psychology.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献