Author:
Mcdaniel Michael A.,Kepes Sven,Banks George C.
Abstract
The primary federal regulation concerning employment testing has not been revised in over 3 decades. The regulation is substantially inconsistent with scientific knowledge and professional guidelines and practice. We summarize these inconsistencies and outline the problems faced by U.S. employers in complying with the regulations. We describe challenges associated with changing federal regulations and invite commentary as to how such changes can be implemented. We conclude that professional organizations, such as the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), should be much more active in promoting science-based federal regulation of employment practices.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference79 articles.
1. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2006). FDA announces plan to strengthen advisory committee processes. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2006/ucm108697.htm.
2. The Status of the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures
3. Differential prediction: A methodological artifact?
4. Peer Review and Federal Regulations
5. Matthew effects in education.;Walberg;Educational Research Quarterly,1983
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Bulanık Ortamda Proje Yöneticisi Seçimi: Savunma Sanayi Firmasında Bir Uygulama;SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi;2024-06-28
2. Authors’ Biographies/Index;The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making;2023-09-07
3. Bibliography;The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making;2023-09-07
4. Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Decision-making: Evaluating Claims and Practices;The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making;2023-09-07
5. Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfare;The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making;2023-09-07