Mend It, Don’t End It: An Alternate View of Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Evidence-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Mend It, Don’t End It: An Alternate View of Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Evidence

Published:2008-03 Issue:1 Volume:1 Page:105-111
ISSN:1754-9426
Container-title:Industrial and Organizational Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Ind. organ. psychol.

Author:

Arthur Winfred,Day Eric Anthony,Woehr David J.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference23 articles.

1. Arthur, W. Jr ., & Villado, A. J . (in press). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology.

2. Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases.

3. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning.

4. Factors which Improve the Construct Validity of Assessment Centers: A Review

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessment centers do not measure competencies: Why this is now beyond reasonable doubt;Industrial and Organizational Psychology;2024-05-09

2. Assessment centers: Reflections, developments, and empirical insights;Industrial and Organizational Psychology;2024-05-06

3. The Impact of Item Parceling Ratios and Strategies on the Internal Structure of Assessment Center Ratings;Journal of Personnel Psychology;2021-01

4. Do overall dimension ratings from assessment centres show external construct-related validity?;European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology;2020-01-29

5. Investigating the construct validity of an electronic in-basket exercise using bias-corrected bootstrapping and Monte Carlo re-sampling techniques;SA Journal of Industrial Psychology;2019-09-26