Associations between enteral nutrition and outcomes in the SUPICU trial: Results of exploratory post hoc analyses

Author:

Borthwick Mark1ORCID,Granholm Anders23ORCID,Marker Søren23ORCID,Krag Mette34,Lange Theis5,Wise Matt P.6ORCID,Bendel Stepani7,Keus Frederik8ORCID,Guttormsen Anne Berit910,Schefold Joerg C.11ORCID,Wetterslev Jørn312,Perner Anders2313ORCID,Møller Morten Hylander23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Pharmacy and Critical Care Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK

2. Department of Intensive Care Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

3. Collaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC) Copenhagen Denmark

4. Department of Intensive Care Holbæk Hospital Holbæk Denmark

5. Section of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

6. Department of Adult Critical Care University Hospital of Wales Cardiff UK

7. Department of Intensive Care Medicine Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland

8. Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

9. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital University of Bergen Bergen Norway

10. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway

11. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital University of Bern Bern Switzerland

12. Private office, Tuborg Sundpark Copenhagen Denmark

13. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEnteral nutrition may affect risks of gastrointestinal bleeding, pneumonia and mortality in critically ill patients and may also modify the effects of pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis. We undertook post hoc analyses of the stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit trial to assess for any associations and interactions between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole.MethodsExtended Cox models with time‐varying co‐variates and competing events were used to assess potential associations, adjusted for baseline severity of illness. Potential interactions between daily enteral nutrition and allocation to pantoprazole on outcomes were similarly assessed.ResultsEnteral nutrition was associated with lower risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (cause‐specific hazard ratio [HR]: 0.29, 95% confidence interval: [CI] 0.19–0.44, p < .001), higher risk of pneumonia (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14–1.82, p = .003), and lower risk of all‐cause mortality (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.18–0.27, p < .001). Enteral nutrition with allocation to pantoprazole was associated with a lower risk of mortality (HR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.21–0.35, p < .001), similar to enteral nutrition with allocation to placebo (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.13–0.23, p < .001). Allocation to pantoprazole with no enteral nutrition had little effect on mortality (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.63–1.09, p = .179), whilst allocation to pantoprazole and receipt of enteral nutrition was mostly compatible with increased all‐cause mortality (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.99–1.64, p = .061). The test of interaction between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole treatment allocation for all‐cause mortality was statistically significant (p = .024).ConclusionsEnteral nutrition was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia and a reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. The interaction between pantoprazole and enteral nutrition suggesting an increased risk of mortality requires further study.

Funder

Innovationsfonden

Rigshospitalet

Region Hovedstaden

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3