Peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures—A systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis

Author:

Pisljagic Sanja1,Temberg Jens L.1,Steensbæk Mathias T.1ORCID,Yousef Sina1,Maagaard Mathias2ORCID,Chafranska Lana1,Lange Kai H. W.13,Rothe Christian1,Lundstrøm Lars H.13ORCID,Nørskov Anders K.13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ North Zealand Hillerød Denmark

2. Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology Zealand University Hospital Køge Denmark

3. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPeripheral nerve blocks may provide better conditions for closed reduction of distal radius fractures as compared to other more frequently used modalities. In this systematic review, we evaluate existing evidence on the effect and harm of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures in adults.MethodsWe performed a systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis including trials investigating the use of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures. Co‐primary outcomes were (1) the quality of the closed reduction measured as the proportion of participants needing surgery afterwards and (2) pain during closed reduction.ResultsSix trials (n = 312) met the inclusion criteria. One trial reported on the need for surgery with 4 of 25 participants receiving nerve block compared to 7 of 25 receiving haematoma block needing surgery (RR 0.57, 96.7% CI [0.19; 1.71], p = .50). Four trials reported pain during closed reduction. In a meta‐analysis, pain was not statistically significantly reduced with a nerve block (−2.1 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) points (0–10), 96.7% CI [−4.4; 0.2], p = .07, tau2 = 5.4, I2 = 97%, TSA‐adj. 95% CI [−11.5; 7.3]). No trial sequential boundaries were crossed, and the required information size was not met. Pre‐planned subgroup analysis on trials evaluating ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks (patients = 110) showed a significant decrease in ‘pain during reduction’ (−4.1 NRS, 96.7% CI [−5.5; −2.6], p < .01, tau2 = 0.9, I2 = 80%). All trial results were at high risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence was very low.ConclusionThe certainty of evidence on the effect of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures is currently very low. Peripheral nerve blocks performed with ultrasound guidance may potentially reduce pain during closed reduction. High‐quality clinical trials are warranted.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference50 articles.

1. Fracture of the distal radius: epidemiology and premanagement radiographic characterisation;Porrino JA;AJR Am J Roentgenol,2014

2. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review;Court‐Brown CM;Injury,2006

3. Fracture incidence in adults in relation to age and gender: a study of 27,169 fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register in a well‐defined catchment area;Bergh C;PLoS One,2020

4. Epidemiology of distal forearm fracture: a population‐based study of 5426 fractures;Sørensen S, Larsen P, Korup LR;Hand,2024

5. Sundhedsstyrelsen.National clinical guideline on the treatment of distal radial fractures. 2017. Available from:https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2014/NKR-Behandling-af-haandledsnaere-brud

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3