Interventions to reduce nurses' burnout: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Yildirim Nezaket1ORCID,Yesilbas Hande2ORCID,Kantek Filiz1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing Management, Faculty of Nursing Akdeniz University Antalya Turkey

2. VM Medical Park Kocaeli Hospital Kocaeli Turkey

Abstract

AbstractAimTo evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce nurses' burnout.DesignA systematic review and meta‐analysis.MethodsThe research was carried out using the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ULAKBİM Turkish National Database, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The study selection, quality assessments, and data extractions of the included studies were carried out by the researchers independently. The PRISMA checklist was used to assure the quality and transparency of the report. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The meta‐analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis (CMA) 3.0 software.ResultsA total of 19 studies including 1139 nurses were included in the study. Of these, only 13 were included in the meta‐analysis, as six contained incomplete data. Interventions aimed at reducing burnout in nurses were mostly person‐directed interventions. The meta‐analysis revealed that attempts to reduce burnout had a small effect on nurses' emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and a moderate effect on their personal accomplishment.ConclusionsInterventions are more effective at preventing the sense of personal accomplishment of nurses from decreasing. Evidence in the literature on organization‐directed interventions and combined interventions to reduce burnout in nurses is limited. Person‐directed interventions are effective at low and medium levels. In future studies, it will be more effective to implement combined interventions including both person‐directed and organization‐directed interventions to reduce the burnout of nurses.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Research and Theory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3