Long‐term outcomes of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and negative programmed ventricular stimulation followed with implantable loop recorders: Impact of delayed‐enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundProgramed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is a risk stratification tool in patients at risk for adverse arrhythmia outcomes. Patients with negative PVS may yet be at risk for adverse arrhythmia‐related events, particularly in the presence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (VA).ObjectiveTo investigate the long‐term outcomes of real‐world patients with symptomatic VA without indication for device therapy and negative PVS, and to examine the role of cardiac scaring on arrhythmia recurrence.MethodsPatients with symptomatic VA, and late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE‐CMR), and negative PVS testing were included. All patients underwent placement of implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). Survival analysis was performed to investigate the impact of LGE‐CMR findings on survival free from adverse arrhythmic events.ResultsSeventy‐eight patients were included (age 60 ± 14 years, women n = 36 (46%), ejection fraction 57 ± 9%, cardiomyopathy n = 26 (33%), mitral valve prolapse [MVP] n = 9 (12%), positive LGE‐CMR scar n = 49 (62%), history of syncope n = 23 (29%)) including patients with primarily premature ventricular contractions (n = 21) or nonsustained VA (n = 57). Patients were followed for 1.6 ± 1.5 years during which 14 patients (18%) experienced VA requiring treatment (n = 14) or syncope due to bradycardia (n = 2). Four/9 patients (44%) with MVP experienced VA (n = 3) or syncope (n = 1). Baseline characteristics between those with and without adverse events were similar (p > 0.05); however, the presence of cardiac scar on LGE‐CMR was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio: 5.6 95% confidence interval: [1.2–27], p = 0.03, log‐rank p = 0.03).ConclusionsIn a real‐world cohort with long‐term follow‐up, adverse arrhythmic outcomes occurred in 18% of patients with symptomatic VA despite negative PVS, and this risk was significantly greater in patients with positive DE‐CMR scar. Long term‐monitoring, including the use of ICM, may be appropriate in these patients.