Abstract
Many educational historians no doubt have experienced the inevitable cocktail party question: “so what is your area of specialization?” Whether uttered over the clink of ice or in some other social setting, the answer is rarely simple. Real historians, after all, are supposed to work in history departments, and to focus on periods and places rather than a specific type of institution. For many people, it seems hard to comprehend the idea of history taught in schools of education, or just how such a field might be considered interesting or important.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference112 articles.
1. Fogel Robert William . "The Reunification of Economic History with Economic Theory." The American Economic Review 55, no. 1/2 (March 1965,): 92-98
2. Idem, "The New Economic History: Its Findings and Methods." The Economic History Review New Series, 19, no. 3 (1966): 642-656
3. Meyer John R. and Conrad Alfred H. "Economic Theory, Statistical Inference, and Economic History." The Journal of Economic History 17, no. 4 (December 1957): 524-544
4. North Douglass C. "The State of Economic History." The American Economic Review 55, no. 1/2 (March 1965): 86-91.
5. These findings were obtained by examining a sample of two hundred from the online membership directory of the History of Science Society, selected randomly by the starting letters of surnames.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献