Thurstonian models for three variants (specified, unspecified, and unspecified with forgiveness) of the Two‐Out‐of‐Five method

Author:

Bi Jian1ORCID,Kuesten Carla2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sensometrics Research and Service Virginia USA

2. Kuesten Sensory Perception Research, LLC Richland Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractThe Two‐Out‐of‐Five method is one of the basic sensory discrimination methods. It is a special case of the ‘M+N’ method with M = 3 and N = 2. Three variants of the method are discussed in the paper: specified, unspecified, and unspecified with forgiveness. Analytical and simulation‐derived psychometric functions for all three variants of the Two‐Out‐of‐Five method are derived and produced. The performance of the method in both difference and similarity/equivalence tests are explored. It is shown that both difference and similarity/equivalence testing powers for the specified Two‐Out‐of‐Five are larger than those for the 2‐AFC and 3‐AFC. Both difference and similarity/equivalence testing powers for the unspecified Two‐Out‐of‐Five are larger than those for the Triangle and Duo‐trio. Both difference and similarity/equivalence testing powers for the unspecified with forgiveness Two‐Out‐of‐Five are larger than those for the conventional unspecified Two‐Out‐of‐Five and unspecified Tetrads. Tables and R codes are presented and provided for estimations of the probability of correct response, Pc, Thurstonian discriminal distance or d', and the B value for estimating the variance of d' for the three variants of the Two‐Out‐of‐Five method.Practical ApplicationsThe Two‐Out‐of‐Five method is a powerful sensory discrimination method. However, this method has not been used widely in sensory and consumer research, partly since the method has not been explored adequately in the literature. This paper explores the Two‐Out‐of‐Five method and shows that the method has potential for wide application. The Two‐Out‐of‐Five method involves a larger number of samples (5) and sensory fatigue may be of concern. Hence, the method may not be suitable for taste and smell tests with strong stimuli. The method is particularly suitable for manual and visual inspection testing where sensory fatigue is of a lesser concern.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sensory Systems,Food Science

Reference18 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Thurstonian model for the four-interval oddity task;Food Quality and Preference;2023-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3