A scoping review of parental values during prenatal decisions about treatment options after extremely premature birth

Author:

de Boer Angret12ORCID,de Vries Marieke3,Berken Dirk‐Jan4,van Dam Hiske4,Verweij E. Joanne2ORCID,Hogeveen Marije1ORCID,Geurtzen Rosa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neonatology Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital Nijmegen The Netherlands

2. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

3. Institute for Computing and Information Sciences (iCIS) Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands

4. Parents of an extremely premature infant born at 24 week gestation The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAimTo describe what is known in the literature about parental perspectives in making prenatal decisions regarding treatment after birth at the limit of viability, as a better understanding of parental values can help professionals support parents as they decide.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant literature from 1 January 2010 to 22 April 2022 on parental decision making. Data were extracted from selected studies and organised into themes. The final themes were formed through collaboration with the parents of a premature infant born at 24 weeks.ResultsOf the 15,159 papers examined, 17 were included. Parental perspectives were described in terms of long‐term outcomes for the infant, survival, protection against the burden of neonatal treatment, long‐term impact on the family, religion and spiritual beliefs, to do everything possible, hope, sense of responsibility, wanting the best, doing what is right, giving a chance and the influence of experience.ConclusionThe extracted parental perspectives show the complexity of these decisions. Some perspectives were clear, but others were multi‐interpretable. Increasing the understanding of common parental perspectives can help improve shared prenatal decisions and lead to further improvement and personalisation of the process.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3