Vision‐related quality of life in children: Cross‐cultural adaptation and test–retest reliability of the Danish version of the paediatric refractive error profile 2

Author:

Cerullo Chiara1ORCID,Møller Flemming2ORCID,Ewan Roy3,Nørgaard Birgitte1ORCID,Jakobsen Trine Moldrup2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

2. Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital Vejle Denmark

3. Department of Ophthalmology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo translate and cross‐culturally adapt PREP2 into Danish and to investigate the face validity and reliability of Danish PREP2 through cognitive interviewing, Rasch and reliability analyses.MethodsThe Danish PREP2 was translated using a standardized procedure and then pretested following the Three‐Steps‐Interviews (TSTI) process. A total of 15 myopic children aged 7–14 wearing either orthokeratology lenses (ortho‐k) or single‐vision spectacles (SVS) were included in pretesting comprising cognitive interviews and Rasch analysis. Data from cognitive interviewing was analysed thematically according to Collins. Rasch analysis was used to pretest the psychometric properties in terms of person‐ and item‐fit statistics. Reliability was assessed via test–retest using Intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC) in the CONTROL study population, which consisted of 60 Danish children aged 7–14 years wearing either ortho‐k or SVS.ResultsFifteen children participated in pilot studies comprising of cognitive interviewing and Rasch analysis and 44 out of 60 CONTROL children participated in test–retest reliability analysis. The translation process resulted in a Danish version of PREP2 corroborating the original. Pretesting highlighted issues in the contextualization of items and in marking responses. Thus, we introduced a digital format with help texts. Cognitive interviewing identified issues in the following Collins’ themes: comprehension (understanding of concepts), judgement (ambiguity of items) and response (selecting answers). Rasch analysis indicated that help texts were useful for clarifying context. The ICC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66–0.85).ConclusionsThe cross‐cultural adaptation of PREP2 was satisfactory and issues were identified and corrected through pretesting. The test–retest reliability showed substantial consistency. The instrument could be validated in a more generalizable setting in future studies. Trial registration: NCT03246464 (CONTROL study).

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3