Diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing in the genetic screening of fetuses with brain anomalies detected by MRI and ultrasonography: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Moradi Behnaz12,Ariaei Armin13ORCID,Heidari‐Foroozan Mahsa14,Banihashemian Masoumeh15,Ghorani Hamed16,Rashidi‐Nezhad Ali7,Kazemi Mohammad Ali18,Taheri Morteza Sanei9

Affiliation:

1. Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

2. Department of Radiology, Yas Complex Hospital Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

3. Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

4. Student Research Committee, School of Medicine Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

5. Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

6. School of Medicine Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

7. Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Centre, Family Health Research Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

8. Department of Radiology, Amiralam Hospital Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

9. Department of Radiology Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBrain anomalies (BAs) have been the focus of research, as they have a high impact on fetal health but therapeutic and diagnostic approaches are limited.ObjectivesIn this study, the application and efficiency of exome sequencing (ES) in detecting different cases of BAs in fetuses were evaluated and compared with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).Search strategyTo conduct this study, three databases including PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were utilised with the keywords ‘prenatal’, ‘diagnoses’, ‘brain anomalies’ and ‘exome sequencing’.Selection criteriaStudies were included based on the STARD checklist, for which the ES and CMA diagnostic yields were calculated.Data collection and analysisMeta‐analysis was performed on the included studies using a random‐effects model and subgroup analysis to define the risk difference between them.Main resultsWe included 11 studies representing 779 fetuses that implemented ES along with imaging techniques. The pooled ES diagnostic yield in fetuses with BAs detected through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography was 26.53%, compared with 3.46% for CMA. The risk difference between ES and CMA for complex BAs was 0.36 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24–0.47], which was higher than for single BAs (0.22; 95% CI 0.18–0.25].ConclusionsES is a useful method with a significantly higher diagnostic yield than CMA for genetic assessment of fetuses with complex BAs detected by imaging techniques. Moreover, ES could be applied to suspected fetuses with related family histories to predict congenital diseases with high efficiency.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference33 articles.

1. Prevalence and timing of pregnancy termination for brain malformations;Rouleau C;Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2011

2. Evaluation of fetal central nervous system anomalies by ultrasound and its anatomical co‐relation;Onkar D;J Clin Diagn Res,2014

3. Reducing inequities in preventable neural tube defects: the critical and underutilized role of neurosurgical advocacy for folate fortification;Estevez‐Ordonez D;Neurosurg Focus,2018

4. Molecular genetics in fetal neurology;Huang J;Semin Fetal Neonatal Med,2012

5. Whole genome sequencing expands diagnostic utility and improves clinical management in pediatric medicine;Stavropoulos DJ;NPJ Genom Med,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3