Immediate versus delayed urinary catheter removal following non‐hysterectomy benign gynaecological laparoscopy: a randomised trial

Author:

McCormack Lalla123ORCID,Song Sophia123,Budden Aaron123,Ma Christine123,Nguyen Kimberly123,Li Fiona G.123,Lim Claire Y.123ORCID,Maheux‐Lacroix Sarah123,Arnold Amy123,Deans Rebecca123,Won Ha Ryun123,Knapman Blake123,Nesbitt‐Hawes Erin123,Abbott Jason A.123

Affiliation:

1. School of Clinical Medicine UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Gynaecology Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Group Royal Hospital for Women Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Prince of Wales Private Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare rates of urinary retention and postoperative urinary tract infection between women with immediate versus women with delayed removal of indwelling catheter following benign non‐hysterectomy gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.DesignThis randomised clinical trial was conducted between February 2012 and December 2019, with follow‐up to 6 weeks.SettingTwo university‐affiliated teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia.PopulationStudy participants were 693 women aged 18 years or over, undergoing non‐hysterectomy laparoscopy for benign gynaecological conditions, excluding pelvic floor or concomitant bowel surgery.MethodsThree hundred and fifty‐five participants were randomised to immediate removal of urinary catheter and 338 participants were randomised to delayed removal of urinary catheter.Main outcome measuresThe co‐primary outcomes were urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission, analgesia requirements, duration of hospitalisation and validated bladder function questionnaires.ResultsUrinary retention was higher after immediate compared with delayed removal of the urinary catheter (8.2% vs 4.2%, RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0–3.0, p = 0.04). Although urinary tract infection was 7.2% following delayed removal of the urinary catheter and 4.7% following immediate removal of the urinary catheter, the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3–1.2, p = 0.2).ConclusionsThere is an increased risk of urinary retention with the immediate compared with the delayed removal of the urinary catheter following benign non‐hysterectomy gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. The difference in urinary tract infection was not significant. There is 1/12 risk of re‐catheterisation after immediate urinary catheter removal. It is important to ensure that patients report normal voiding and emptying prior to discharge, to reduce the need for readmission for the management of urinary retention.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3