Morphological study of the placenta in deliveries with pre‐eclampsia: Results from a prospective, observational study in India and Pakistan (PURPOSe)

Author:

Yogeshkumar S.1,Dhananjay Shobha2,Gowdar Sarvamangala2,Gowdar Guruprasad2,Kulkarni Vardendra2,Byranahalli Sunil2,Goudar Shivaprasad S.1,Dhaded Sangappa M.1,Somannavar Manjunath S.1ORCID,Tikamani Shiyam Sunder3,Saleem Sarah3,Ahmed Imran3,Ghanchi Najia Karim3,Uddin Zeeshan3,Yasmin Haleema4,Jackson Kay5,McClure Elizabeth M.5ORCID,Goldenberg Robert L.6

Affiliation:

1. Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research Belagavi Karnataka India

2. Bapuji Education Association's JJM Medical College Davangere Karnataka India

3. Aga Khan University Karachi Pakistan

4. Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi Pakistan

5. RTI International Durham North Carolina USA

6. Columbia University New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare placental findings in women with and without pre‐eclampsia.DesignThe PURPOSe study included women with stillbirths, women with preterm births and women at term as controls. The placenta of each case was evaluated using the Amsterdam criteria.SettingTwo sites and five tertiary care hospitals of south Asia (Three in India and two in Pakistan).PopulationPregnancies in India and Pakistan with placental histology including women with documented hypertension and documented proteinuria and women with neither hypertension nor proteinuria.MethodsWe compared the placental findings of the two groups using the Amsterdam criteria and further evaluated the placental findings in women with and without pre‐eclampsia who had a stillbirth, preterm live birth, or term live birth (control).Main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were the frequency of maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion and the frequency of placental inflammation and its components, chorioamnionitis, funisitis, villitis and intervillitis in women with and without pre‐eclampsia.ResultsA total of 733 women had pre‐eclampsia and 2334 women had neither hypertension nor proteinuria. In the placentas of women with pre‐eclampsia, 57.3% had maternal vascular malperfusion compared with 37.1% in women without pre‐eclampsia (p < 0.0001). There was not a significant difference in the prevalence of fetal vascular hypertension between mothers with (17.1%) and without (14.8%, p = 0.6118) pre‐eclampsia. When placentas were classified as ‘histologically normal’ or not, 61.3% of those from pre‐eclamptic pregnancies were classified as abnormal, whereas if there was no pre‐eclampsia, only 45.0% were classified as histologically abnormal (p < 0.0001). We also considered rates of placental maternal vascular malperfusion in women with and without pre‐eclampsia with stillbirth, preterm neonatal death, and term live birth. In women at term with no pre‐eclampsia, 16.7% of the placentas had features of maternal vascular malperfusion. This occurred in 79.9% of women with stillbirths with pre‐eclampsia compared with 51.8% of those without pre‐eclampsia. Maternal vascular malperfusion was present in 49.7% of preterm live births with pre‐eclampsia compared with 33.8% without pre‐eclampsia. We also evaluated the inflammatory lesions by whether the mother had or did not have pre‐eclampsia. When all inflammatory lesions were considered, women with pre‐eclampsia had significantly fewer inflammatory lesions than those women without pre‐eclampsia (17.1% versus 23.6% p = 0.001). Each of the specific inflammatory lesions was less common in placentas of women with pre‐eclampsia than those with chorioamnionitis (16.1% versus 21.9%, p = 0.004) and funisitis (1.5% versus. 5.1%, p = 0.0004).ConclusionsOf placental lesions in women with pre‐eclampsia, maternal vascular malperfusion was the most common. Inflammatory lesions were less common in women with pre‐eclampsia.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3