Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccination on menstrual bleeding quantity: An observational cohort study

Author:

Darney Blair G.12ORCID,Boniface Emily R.1ORCID,Van Lamsweerde Agathe3,Han Leo1,Matteson Kristen A.4,Cameron Sharon5ORCID,Male Victoria6ORCID,Acuna Juan7,Benhar Eleonora3,Pearson Jack T.3,Edelman Alison1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Oregon Heath & Science University Portland Oregon USA

2. Centro de Investigacion en Salud Poblacional (CISP) Insituto Nacional de Salud Publica (INSP) Cuernavaca Mexico

3. Natural Cycles° New York NY USA

4. University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Worcester Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology University of Edinburgh and Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian Edinburgh Scotland UK

6. Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction Imperial College London London UK

7. Florida International University School of Public Health Miami Florida USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccination impacts menstrual bleeding quantity.DesignRetrospective cohort.SettingFive global regions.PopulationVaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with regular menstrual cycles using the digital fertility‐awareness application Natural Cycles°.MethodsWe used prospectively collected menstrual cycle data, multivariable longitudinal Poisson generalised estimating equation (GEE) models and multivariable multinomial logistic regression models to calculate the adjusted difference between vaccination groups. All regression models were adjusted for confounding factors.Main outcome measuresThe mean number of heavy bleeding days (fewer, no change or more) and changes in bleeding quantity (less, no change or more) at three time points (first dose, second dose and post‐exposure menses).ResultsWe included 9555 individuals (7401 vaccinated and 2154 unvaccinated). About two‐thirds of individuals reported no change in the number of heavy bleeding days, regardless of vaccination status. After adjusting for confounding factors, there were no significant differences in the number of heavy bleeding days by vaccination status. A larger proportion of vaccinated individuals experienced an increase in total bleeding quantity (34.5% unvaccinated, 38.4% vaccinated; adjusted difference 4.0%, 99.2% CI 0.7%–7.2%). This translates to an estimated 40 additional people per 1000 individuals with normal menstrual cycles who experience a greater total bleeding quantity following the first vaccine dose' suffice. Differences resolved in the cycle post‐exposure.ConclusionsA small increase in the probability of greater total bleeding quantity occurred following the first COVID‐19 vaccine dose, which resolved in the cycle after the post‐vaccination cycle. The total number of heavy bleeding days did not differ by vaccination status. Our findings can reassure the public that any changes are small and transient.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference28 articles.

1. Committee Opinion No. 651

2. Revisiting menstruation: the misery, mystery, and marvel

3. MorganE.Periods: why women's menstrual cycles have gone haywire.The Guardian. 2021 Mar 25.

4. LandmanK.Why were scientists so slow to study Covid‐19 vaccines and menstruation? [Internet]. Vox.2022[cited 2022 Aug 1]. Available from:https://www.vox.com/22935125/covid‐vaccine‐trials‐menstrual‐cycle‐period‐changes‐fertility‐myths

5. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3