Comparing the psychological outcomes of donor and non‐donor conceived people: A systematic review

Author:

Talbot Charlotte1ORCID,Hodson Nathan2,Rose Joanne3,Bewley Susan4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

2. Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing Warwick Medical School Coventry UK

3. Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health & Department of Infectious Disease Imperial College London London UK

4. Department of Women and Children's Health King's College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOver 70 000 donor‐conceived (DC) people have been born in the UK since 1991. Little is known about their long‐term psychological outcomes and no systematic review has assessed these.ObjectivesTo conduct a systematic review of the psychological experiences of DC people through childhood and adulthood (Prospero: CRD42021257863).Search strategySearches of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHAL), the Excerpta Medica database (Embase), MEDLINE® and PsycINFO, conducted on 4 January 2024.Selection criteriaQuantitative and qualitative studies were included if: there were five or more participants; they were peer reviewed; and any DC psychological outcomes were assessed. No limits on date, language or country were applied.Data collection and analysisDouble screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed, using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoring.Main resultsFifty studies (with 4666 DC participants), mostly from high‐income anglophone countries, with heterogeneity of design, populations and outcome measures, were included. Of 19 comparative studies, 14 found no difference in outcomes between DC and non‐DC people, ten found better outcomes (in health, well‐being, self‐esteem and emotional warmth) and six found worse outcomes (increased autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, addiction issues, mental illness, disruptive behaviour and identity problems). Qualitative data revealed common themes relating to identity formation, mistrust and concerns regarding genetic heritage. The evidence regarding adulthood outcomes was very limited.ConclusionsThe research on DC individuals presents a nuanced picture, with most studies suggesting comparable or improved outcomes in terms of well‐being and relationships, but with a notable minority indicating higher rates of mental health and identity struggles. Qualitative findings underscore common negative experiences, whereas the early disclosure of DC status appears beneficial for psychological well‐being.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference75 articles.

1. Human Fertilisation and Embrology Authority.Trends in egg sperm and embryo donation 2020.2022Available from:https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about‐us/publications/research‐and‐data/trends‐in‐egg‐sperm‐and‐embryo‐donation‐2020/

2. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.Using donated eggs sperm or embryos in treatment. [cited 1923 May 29]. Available from:https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/explore‐all‐treatments/using‐donated‐eggs‐sperm‐or‐embryos‐in‐treatment/

3. Association between Family Functionality and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

4. Early Family Relationships Predict Children’s Emotion Regulation and Defense Mechanisms

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3