Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Models for the Risk of Emergency Caesarean Births

Author:

Hunt Alexandra1ORCID,Bonnett Laura1ORCID,Heron Jon2ORCID,Lawton Michael3ORCID,Clayton Gemma2ORCID,Smith Gordon45ORCID,Norman Jane6ORCID,Kenny Louise7ORCID,Lawlor Deborah2,Merriel Abi89ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Data Science The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

2. Bristol Medical School The University of Bristol Bristol UK

3. Bristol Population Health Science Institute The University of Bristol Bristol UK

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology The University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

5. The Rosie Hospital Cambridge UK

6. The University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

7. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

8. Centre for Women's Health Research, Department of Women's and Children's Health University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

9. Liverpool Women's Hospital Liverpool UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundGlobally, caesarean births (CB), including emergency caesareans births (EmCB), are rising. It is estimated that nearly a third of all births will be CB by 2030.ObjectivesIdentify and summarise the results from studies developing and validating prognostic multivariable models predicting the risk of EmCBs. Ultimately understanding the accuracy of their development, and whether they are operationalised for use in routine clinical practice.Search StrategyStudies were identified using databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Scopus with a search strategy tailored to models predicting EmCBs.Selection CriteriaProspective studies developing and validating clinical prediction models, with two or more covariates, to predict risk of EmCB.Data Collection and AnalysisData were extracted onto a proforma using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).ResultsIn total, 8083 studies resulted in 56 unique prediction modelling studies and seven validating studies, with a total of 121 different predictors. Frequently occurring predictors included maternal height, maternal age, parity, BMI and gestational age. PROBAST highlighted 33 studies with low overall bias, and these all internally validated their model. Thirteen studies externally validated; only eight of these were graded an overall low risk of bias. Six models offered applications that could be readily used, but only one provided enough time to offer a planned caesarean birth (pCB). These well‐refined models have not been recalibrated since development. Only one model, developed in a relatively low‐risk population, with data collected a decade ago, remains useful at 36 weeks for arranging a pCB.ConclusionTo improve personalised clinical conversations, there is a pressing need for a model that accurately predicts the timely risk of an EmCB for women across diverse clinical backgrounds.Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023384439.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3