Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study

Published:2018-09-10 Issue:13 Volume:125 Page:1673-1680
ISSN:1470-0328
Container-title:BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
language:en
Short-container-title:BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy

Author:

Dos Santos F¹,Drymiotou S²,Antequera Martin A³,Mol BW⁴,Gale C⁵,Devane D⁶,van't Hooft J⁷,Johnson MJ⁸⁹,Hogg M¹⁰,Thangaratinam S¹¹

Affiliation:

1. Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Health Education England London; Barts Health NHS Trust - The Royal London Hospital; London UK

2. Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ST2); Health Education England London; Barts Health NHS Trust - The Royal London Hospital; London UK

3. Internal Medicine Department; La Princesa Hospital; Madrid Spain

4. Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Monash University; Clayton Vic. Australia

5. Neonatal Medicine; Imperial College London; London UK

6. Midwifery; HRB - Trials Methodology Research Network/School of Nursing and Midwifery; National University of Ireland Galway; Galway Ireland

7. Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Academic Medical Centre; Amsterdam The Netherlands

8. Department of Neonatal Medicine; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust - Princess Anne Hospital; Southampton UK

9. National Institute for Health Research; Southampton Biomedical Research Centre; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; University of Southampton; Southampton UK

10. Barts Health NHS Trust - The Royal London Hospital; London UK

11. Maternal and Perinatal Health - Women's Health Research Unit; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry - Queen Mary University of London; Barts Health NHS Trust; London UK

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.15397/fullpdf

Reference31 articles.

1. Outcomes reported in trials of methods for the induction of labour;Medley;Trials,2015

2. Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review;Meher;BJOG,2014

3. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews;Clarke;Trials,2007

4. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence;Chalmers;Lancet,2009

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Patient experience in prostaglandins-induced cervical ripening: A comparative study using a standardized questionnaire;European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology;2024-09

2. Ensemble learning for fetal ultrasound and maternal–fetal data to predict mode of delivery after labor induction;Scientific Reports;2024-07-03

3. Oral misoprostol alone, compared with oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin, in women induced for hypertension of pregnancy: A multicentre randomised trial;BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology;2024-05-10

4. The effects of intravenous hydration regimens in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor: A systematic review and meta‐analysis;Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica;2024-03-11

5. Méthodes pharmacologiques ou mécaniques pour la maturation cervicale : une revue de la littérature;Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie ;2024-03